Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2016 Year 2016 This

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise ...


Court Rules on Excise Duty Refund Claim: Recording as Expense Doesn't Prove Duty Passed to Others.

October 4, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise duty is booked as expenditure in Profit & Loss account, it cannot be said the incidence of duty has been passed on - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

  2. Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

  3. 100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

  4. Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

  5. Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

  6. CESTAT allowed appeal regarding refund of erroneously paid excise duty on imported SKO. Appellant substantiated claim through PLA records, TR-6 challans, invoices, and...

  7. Refund of Central Excise Duty - SEZ units - There is no mechanism under SEZ Rules for claiming rebate/refund on goods procured from the DTA. - In the absence of any...

  8. The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

  9. Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

  10. The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

  11. CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

  12. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of...

  13. Refund of Excise Duty, paid under protest - The refund claim is filed within one month after passing of the second Order-in-Appeal which is dated 27.02.2018. The claim...

  14. The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

  15. Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates