The STO virtually reviewed the decision of the Commissioner u/s ...

VAT and Sales Tax

December 5, 2016

The STO virtually reviewed the decision of the Commissioner u/s 49 which, merged with the order of the Tribunal, as it were, based on no new material much less any significant material which could have permitted an authority to validly reopen assessment u/s 24 - re-assessment order quashed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The STO virtually reviewed the decision of the Commissioner u/s ...

VAT and Sales Tax

December 5, 2016

You may also like:

Amends Notification No. 49/2008-CX., (N.T.), Dated: December 24, 2008 - MRP based duty of Excise - Prescribes rate of abatement - Notification

Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - The judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays down that...

Review of the order - The Tribunal does not have the power to even review an order, much less to hear the appeal afresh on merit.

Power of AO in remanded matter - impact of direction of Tribunal - role of the AO was limited to giving effect to the directions of the Tribunal - if the Department had...

Assessment against non existent company [company merged] - assessment in the hands of the successor - Whatever action has done in the past by their share applicants...

The Tribunal does not have power to review its judgment under Section 254(2) of the Act, which authorises the Tribunal to only correct its mistakes - HC

Power of Tribunal to recall its earlier order and hear the appeal afresh - power to review or power of rectification – Tribunal committed no error in exercising power...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Mere filing a review petition before the SC cannot be held that the decision rendered are not valid as on date - HC

Review petition - The tribunal dismissed the review application, stating it was not maintainable in the petitioner's personal capacity and lacked merit. It emphasized...

Quick Updates: