Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2016 Year 2016 This

Valuation - job work - The main appellant (Avtec) are liable to ...

Central Excise

December 7, 2016

Valuation - job work - The main appellant (Avtec) are liable to pay differential duty due to revised valuation of FOC materials supplied by GMI. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Rejection of refund claim - Demand under Business Auxiliary Service - Job work where principal is liable to pay excise duty - not liable to pay service tax - AT

  2. Valuation - Job work - the value of scrap cleared need not be included for discharging the duty liability on the job worked item

  3. Valuation - Job work - fabric + job work charges – alleged that merchant manufacturers suppressed the value of grey fabric, which resulted in short payment of duty by...

  4. Valuation - Job-work - The valuation of job worked goods computed by the department on the basis of cost of raw material + job work charges is incorrect.

  5. Job work - valuation under central excise - Rule 10A(i) or (ii) or Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules will not apply in respect of job worked goods consumed by the principal...

  6. Demand for interest on delayed payment of duty - appellant is liable to pay the interest on the differential duty paid through supplementary invoices.

  7. MRP valuation – Interest on differential duty liability due to alternation of MRP at Depot - footwear – matter remanded back - AT

  8. Adjustment of short paid duty with excess duty paid - Job Work - Motor vehicles - HC refused to interfere into the order of CESTAT allowing adjustment.

  9. Levy of GST - job work charges charged for manufacturing of Cattle Feed / Poultry Feed on job work basis - scope of supply - the activity is liable to GST @5%

  10. Disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Job works - Whether the job workers can prefer to pay excise duty in spite of having exemption notification bearing no. 214 of 1986 - held yes - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates