Penalty u/s 78 - Without the raising of the demand u/s 73(1) ...

Service Tax

February 24, 2017

Penalty u/s 78 - Without the raising of the demand u/s 73(1) ibid and its determination by the adjudicating authority, the penalty u/s 78 of the Act is not sustainable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - Without the raising of the demand u/s 73(1) ...

Service Tax

February 24, 2017

You may also like:

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire Service Tax and interest paid before issuance of SCN - the appellant have not complied with the provision of section 73(3) and...

Issue of SCN and payment of penalty - Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Recovery of excess amount collected as service tax - Although show cause notice invoked the provisions of Section 73-A of the Act, but the adjudicating authority has not...

Confirmation of service tax demand by invoking proviso to Section 73 (1) and waiver of penalty by invoking Section 80 do not go hand in hand- AT

Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax - invocation of Section 80 ibid cannot necessary imply that there was no suppression or wilful mis-statement. Once...

Quick Updates: