Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the ...

Guilty of Fact Suppression: Equal Penalty Imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

April 21, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent is guilty of suppression of facts - The law laid u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 mandates imposition of equal penalty when suppression of facts are established. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the ...

Guilty of Fact Suppression: Equal Penalty Imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

April 21, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire Service Tax and interest paid before issuance of SCN - the appellant have not complied with the provision of section 73(3) and...

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Imposition of penalty - the appellate authority was within its jurisdiction not to levy penalty under section 76 of the Act having regard to the fact that penalty equal...

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Once all the facts are reflected in the ST-3 Returns as well as in the Balance Sheet, the allegation of suppression of facts is...

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

Quick Updates: