Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the ...

Service Tax

April 21, 2017

Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent is guilty of suppression of facts - The law laid u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 mandates imposition of equal penalty when suppression of facts are established. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the ...

Service Tax

April 21, 2017

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Imposition of penalty u/s 76 of the FA, 1994 - delayed payment of tax - financial difficulty - invocation of section 80 - it is a fit case to waive the penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Once all the facts are reflected in the ST-3 Returns as well as in the Balance Sheet, the allegation of suppression of facts is...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 of FA, 1994 - mere failure to take registration or mere non-filing of returns cannot be considered as suppression of facts - penalty waived...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - Since the elements of fraud, mis-statement or suppression of facts etc. with an intent to evade service tax are not present in the matter...

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

Quick Updates: