Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the ...

Central Excise

May 9, 2017

Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit without physical receipt of the inputs - the penalty upon the appellant imposed under Rule 26 will not sustain - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the ...

Central Excise

May 9, 2017

You may also like:

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Imposition of penalty under Rule 26 (2) of CER - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - invoices without actual receipt of inputs - Though the opting of SVLDRS should...

Confiscation of goods - Clandestine removal of goods - since goods were within factory, means rea manifesting that goods were ready for clandestine removal has not been...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

Clandestine removal of goods – For clandestine removal of finished goods, personal penalties are required to be imposed upon the Director and vice President of the main...

Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

Clandestine manufacture and removal of goods - the case of clandestine removals cannot be held as established on the basis of few parallel invoices recovered from a...

CENVAT Credit - scope of definition of input service - outward transportation of the goods - place of removal - In present case, the buyer was retaining the right even...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Quick Updates: