Cenvat credit taken on the inputs, input services and capital ...

Central Excise

June 2, 2017

Cenvat credit taken on the inputs, input services and capital goods, cannot be denied on the ground that those goods and services were used for manufacture of non-dutiable goods, on which duty liability has been discharged from cenvat credit account - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Cenvat credit taken on the inputs, input services and capital ...

Central Excise

June 2, 2017

You may also like:

CENVAT credit - appellant is entitled to avail cenvat credit on these cables either as capital goods or input as per cenvat credit rules 2004 - AT

Cenvat Credit - pre-mature credit on input services - credit availed before making payment - Scope of Rule 4(7) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - credit cannot be denied - AT

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

Refund claim on service tax paid on reverse charge basis denied - the refund of CENVAT Credit on the input service is admissible under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules - AT

Cenvat credit denied - The paint is specifically covered by the definition of input as given in Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - AT

Cenvat Credit - input services - outdoor catering services - Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - credit allowed - HC

CENVAT Credit - input service - the exclusion clause ‘A’ in Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, does not cover the service in the nature of “Erection, Commissioning...

Cenvat Credit - The service tax paid towards accommodation to the experts are rightly covered by the ‘input service' in terms of Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - AT

CENVAT Credit - trading activities - Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 deals solely with the situation of CENVAT Credit resulting from exempted services and exempted...

CENVAT credit - capital goods installed in the distillery plant used for manufacture of Ethyl Alcohol - The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that...

Quick Updates: