Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2017 Year 2017 This

Disallowance of expenditure incurred in construction of house ...


Tax Deduction Denied for Housing Flood Victims: No Proven Business Connection in Social Welfare Spending.

June 19, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Disallowance of expenditure incurred in construction of house meant for flood victims called 'Social Welfare Expenditure' - Mere bald assertion that the expenditure was incurred for promoting business cannot be accepted without establishing the nexus between expenditure and business. Therefore, it amounts to application of income voluntarily towards charity which cannot be allowed as a deduction.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Disallowing social welfare expenditure - expenditure incurred under the head Social Welfare Expenditure for construction of houses to flood victims is in the nature of...

  2. The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

  3. LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed...

  4. Income taxable in India - PE in India - Tax authorities below failed to appreciate the distinction between the existence of a business connection and the income accruing...

  5. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  6. Refund of service tax - amount have been deposited by mistake - Form 26AS, VAT-41, copies of challans and copies of running bills prepared by the Housing Board showing...

  7. Rectification u/s 154 - Deduction claimed u/s. 80IAB - Wrong classification of income under the head ‘income from house property’, has resulted in wrong claim of...

  8. Once the assessee has discharged the initial onus to prove that the deduction is allowable, the onus to prove that the deduction is not admissible, shifts to the tax...

  9. The ITAT allowed the deduction claimed u/s 80G for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure. The solitary reason for denying the deduction by the lower...

  10. LTCG - Denial of exemption u/s 54 - the ITAT observed that, for the purpose of claiming the benefit u/s 54 of the Act, within a period of one year before or two year...

  11. Income tax case involving disallowance of expenses incurred by a company for maintaining a guest house. The legal ownership of the guest house was with the company...

  12. Deduction u/s 54 - investment in two different houses - The Hon’ble Court’s opinion is that, the physical structure of a new residential house whether it is literal or...

  13. Deduction u/s 80IA - the scope of deduction under Section 80IA of the Act is limited to determination of quantum of deduction by treating eligible business as the only...

  14. LTCG - Deduction u/s 54 - Profit on sale of property used for residence - assessee was already in the possession of the residential house at the time of purchase of the...

  15. Deduction u/s 54 - assessee has utilized other funds (apart from sale consideration) for constructing residential house and for this reason only he cannot be denied...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates