Revision u/s 264 - petitioner and his grandmother are co-owners ...

Income Tax

August 10, 2017

Revision u/s 264 - petitioner and his grandmother are co-owners of property sold - joint ownership - seeking the petitioner's income in respect of the transaction pertaining to the said property, be determined in accordance with the decision of the High Court in the petitioner's grandmother's case - AO directed to re-do the assessment - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 - petitioner and his grandmother are co-owners ...

Income Tax

August 10, 2017

You may also like:

Renting of immovable property - inherited property - joint owners - demand of service tax on co-owners when the property is jointly owned by them - cannot be treated as...

SSI exemption - Joint ownership of brand name - each owner is eligible for SSI exemption. - AT

Small service provider - exemption upto 10 lakhs - Renting out of immovable joint property – Exemption to each owner or jointly - prima facie each owner is eligible for...

Capital gain computation - co-ownership at 50% - electivity bills or the society maintenance receipt tax does not prove the title of the property - the transfer...

Renting of immovable property service - joint ownership - their tax liability should have been determined by considering their individual rental receipts and not...

Status of AOP - property purchased by the husband and wife in the joint names - As per the provisions of Section 45 of the Transfer of Property Act in case of joint...

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Validity of Revision u/s 264 - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Whether revision under Section 264 of the 1961 Act is an alternate remedy to the remedy of regular...

Period of limitations u/s 153 - To include order of PCCIT/ CCIT u/s 263 or 264 for revision order which were not available earlier.

Revision power u/s 264 - CIT committed a manifest error in exercising revisional power when petitioner's appeal was pending before CIT (Appeals) - HC

Quick Updates: