CESTAT has held that as Writ Petition has been dismissed it ...

High Court Finds CESTAT Erred by Not Reviewing Demand Legality After Related Writ Petition Dismissal.

December 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

CESTAT has held that as Writ Petition has been dismissed it cannot go into question of legality of the demand made by the said letter DD2. According to us, the said approach of CESTAT is completely erroneous. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT has held that as Writ Petition has been dismissed it ...

High Court Finds CESTAT Erred by Not Reviewing Demand Legality After Related Writ Petition Dismissal.

December 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Sunset review for existing anti-dumping duty - imports of rubber chemicals - Designated authority not only has failed in appreciating the material and accompanying...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

RBI circulars on various issues relating to money laundering activities and issues relating to FII

CIRP - Related party - Appellant being ‘related party’ cannot be part of the CoC - present is not a case where IRP has reviewed its decision - there is no error in the...

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

Key issues regarding invocation of time limitation for raising demand, levy of penalty, exemption from service tax for bundled services related to the game of cricket,...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there...

Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning,...

Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore...

Quick Updates: