Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2018 Year 2018 This

Levying the penalty u/s 271E - loan received by the assessee had ...


Section 271E Penalty Overturned: Court Rules Business Decisions Are Not Revenue Authority's Domain.

March 9, 2018

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Levying the penalty u/s 271E - loan received by the assessee had been squared off by way of conversion of loan into equity - the businessman (i.e. assessee) cannot be compelled by the revenue to conduct its business as per the whims and fancies of the revenue. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

  2. Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - creation/ assignment of debt and liabilities vide journal entries - These entries arise in the normal course of day to day business...

  3. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  4. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  5. Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of Section 269T - repayment by journal entries - penalty imposed u/s 271E deserves to be deleted - HC

  6. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  7. The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

  8. Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

  9. Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

  10. Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section 269T in the preceding assessment year - no proceedings pending before the Ld. AO qua the assessee for A.Y....

  11. Penalty u/s. 271E - violation of the provisions of Section 269T - Repayment of monthly instalment in cash to Tata Finance Corporation - as the assessee had not only...

  12. The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

  13. HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

  14. Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

  15. Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates