Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the ...

Income Tax

March 16, 2018

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act but the inadequate enquiry cannot be a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the ...

Income Tax

March 16, 2018

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - distinction between "lack of enquiry" and "inadequate enquiry" - AO is not required to give detailed reason in respect of each and every item of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure...

Revision u/s 263 - unsecured loan - AO after having received relevant documents including confirmation has not taken pains to verify the veracity of loan transactions...

Revision u/s 263 - determination of assessee share as per will of father - the assessee had filed the copy of the last will and testament of his father, sale deed of the...

Revision u/s 263 - “no inquiry” v/s “inadequate inquiry” - there is a distinction between merely calling for information on a particular issue and considering such...

Revision u/s 263 - One has to keep in mind the distinction between “lack of inquiry” and inadequate inquiry”. - If there was any inquiry, even inadequate that would not...

Revision u/s 263 - carry forward of losses on sale of shares - where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no...

Revision u/s 263 - deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) against interest income earned by the assessee - case falls under the category of ‘no inquiry’ rather than ‘lack of...

Revision u/s 263 - AO has not applied his mind to the issue of share transactions for which the detailed information is available regarding the suspicious nature of the...

Revision u/s 263 - revenue failed to bring on record that the order passed by the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - This is a case of...

Quick Updates: