Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - ...

Income Tax

March 24, 2018

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - Even if it is assumed that the assessing officer has issued a notice u/s 271D on the date of assessment order, i.e., on 31-12-2008, the same would become time barred by 30-06-2009, i.e., within six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - ...

Income Tax

March 24, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of Section 269SS ranged from just 1.1% to 6.14% for the years under appeal - no penalty - HC

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it...

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt in cash being undisclosed income - Loan or advance is a sine qua non or foundational fact for the applicability of the provisions of Section...

Penalty u/s 271D - whether provisions of section 269SS are attracted to the amounts received from sister concern - no penalty - HC

Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s...

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Quick Updates: