Addition u/s 14A - expenses towards exempted income - ...

Income Tax

March 27, 2018

Addition u/s 14A - expenses towards exempted income - Disallowance had to be made only on an estimated basis with regard to the expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning tax free income. - AO directed to disallow 1% of exempt income - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 14A - expenses towards exempted income - ...

Income Tax

March 27, 2018

You may also like:

Disallowance u/s 14A - expenses towards exempted income - AO could not have straightaway resorted to Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Rules in order to compute the disallowance u/s 14A - AT

Disallowance u/s 14A - The disallowance u/s 14A was warranted even if there was no exempt income. - AT

Disallowance u/s 14A - correctness of the claim - no disallowance can be made by the Assessing Officer more than the exempt income - AT

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - In any case, as per section 14A(3) whether or not the assessee has incurred any expenditure for earning exempt income, a part of...

Addition u/s 14A read with rule 8D - categorical finding and satisfaction of the A.O. that expenditure has been incurred to earn the exempt income - Disallowance upheld

Disallowance u/s 14A - The expenditure incurred exclusively for business activity cannot be included in such attributable expenses for the purpose of disallowance u/s.14A - AT

Disallowance u/s 14A - Carry forward of business loss – setting off carry forward business losses now depends on the finality of the addition made by Assessing Officer...

Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - The object of Section 14A is to curb the practice to claim deduction of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income against taxable...

Disallowance u/s 14A in return - not earned any exempt income - request for withdrawal of suo moto disallowance before the AO itself - permitted

Addition u/s 14A r/w rule 8D - There being no income for shares hence obviously there are no administrative and other expenses incurred. In such facts of the case, no...

Quick Updates: