Valuation - Pre-disposed mind itself is sufficient to hold that ...

Service Tax

April 6, 2018

Valuation - Pre-disposed mind itself is sufficient to hold that the decision-making process is erred as the author of the order already directed the petitioner to include transportation of goods charges way back in the year 2010 itself - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - Pre-disposed mind itself is sufficient to hold that ...

Service Tax

April 6, 2018

You may also like:

Pre-deposit made by the appellants by way of debiting in Cenvat Credit Account is sufficient for the purposes of fulfilment of requirement of pre-deposit - AT

Validity of confiscation and detention of goods - Change of route / wrong route for transport of goods - mere change of route without anything more would not necessarily...

The appellant has not made the pre-deposit and even though time was given to the appellant to make the pre-deposit, the pre-deposit has not been made - In view of the...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

The commisioner (appeals) cannot put pre-condition to decide the case in de novo as that would prejudice the mind of the original authority while deciding the issue - AT

Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (ECRL) is sufficient or Debit from electronic cash ledger (ECL) is must?

Waiver of pre deposit - The Tribunal has recorded factual findings that the hardship pleaded by the appellants on the basis of balance sheet for 2001-2002 is not...

Application for waiver of pre-deposit amount under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 - The appellant has not made the pre-deposit. In view of the aforesaid...

Charitable activity - approval u/s 80G denied - Purchase of land and building by itself would not be sufficient to conclude that the assessee is involved in...

SSI exemption - clubbing of clearances - Merely because the partner of two units happen to be the same, by itself, is not sufficient to establish that one unit is dummy...

Quick Updates: