Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of ...

Income Tax

June 3, 2012

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only discover or find the law. Thus, where a decision of the Supreme Court overrules an earlier decision, the views expressed in the later decision would have to be regarded as having always been the law. The overruling is, therefore, retrospective. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of ...

Income Tax

June 3, 2012

You may also like:

Initiation of revisional proceedings - GVAT - Tribunal has materially erred in considering the legality and validity of the initiation of revisional proceedings, taking...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

The Tribunal does not have power to review its judgment under Section 254(2) of the Act, which authorises the Tribunal to only correct its mistakes - HC

Tribunal has the power to extend stay beyond the period of 365 days - decision of the Division Bench in Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. overruled - HC(FB)

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of certain grounds - there is an inadvertent mistake by the Tribunal in not disposing of grounds no.2, 3 and 6, which comes...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - one of ground was not disposed - since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has already been admitted and a substantial question of...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Where the issue sought to be rectified was not appealed before HC, application cannot be rejected on the ground of Doctrine of merger - HC

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - non consideration of decision refereed by the assessee in dealing with appeal - a mistake apparent from record - Tribunal recalled its order.

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Tribunal was not justified in recalling the order passed by it in toto and setting the matter down for a fresh hearing - HC

Rectification u/s 254 - error apparent on face of record - non-disposal of specific ground raised in the grounds of appeal is an error within the meaning of 254(2) -...

Quick Updates: