Levy of Penalty u/s 78 - correct value was declared in the ST-3 ...

No Penalty Imposed: Correct Value Declared in ST-3, No Fact Suppression Under Sec 73(3) Despite Unpaid Service Tax.

May 4, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 - correct value was declared in the ST-3 return but service tax was not paid - The appellant have not suppressed any fact by declaring the correct value in the ST-3 return, their case is covered by Section 73(3). - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 - correct value was declared in the ST-3 ...

No Penalty Imposed: Correct Value Declared in ST-3, No Fact Suppression Under Sec 73(3) Despite Unpaid Service Tax.

May 4, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire Service Tax and interest paid before issuance of SCN - the appellant have not complied with the provision of section 73(3) and...

Penalty imposed u/s 221(1) r.w.s. 140A(3) - non-payment of self-assessment tax - Return of Income as filed u/s 139(1) itself was declared an invalid Return - scope of...

The Department initiated the case based on income tax documents, which were public documents, and the presumption is on their truthfulness. The difference in value based...

Levy of Penalty - Short payment of service tax - Suppression of facts - Section 73(3) is not applicable in the case where suppression of fact is established - However,...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - waiver of penalty - The appellants contention that section 73(3) is applicable in their case is not correct - Once, the ingredients of section...

The appellant's appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal, and the penalty imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. It was held that when an assessee...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

The court held that the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be invoked against the appellant as there was no...

Levy of penalty where the appellant paid entire tax liability and interest - relief u/s 73(3) - unless there is a case of active suppression, provisions of Section 73...

This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

Levy of penalty - In the light of section 73(4) of Finance Act, 1994, which is the sole ground for denying recourse to section 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994, it is clear...

Levy of penalty - Both the lower authorities have erred in confirming the penalty as it is a settled principle that when tax is paid along with interest before issuance...

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Levy of penalty - To suggest that in every case where service tax is being paid on being pointed out by the Department, the benefit of Section 73(3) would not be...

Quick Updates: