Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As against the assessee’s stand of ...

Income Tax

June 2, 2018

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As against the assessee’s stand of claiming such amount as a revenue expenditure, the Tribunal has adopted another route of allowing such deduction in the computation of capital gain by treating it as cost of improvement. These facts do not warrant imposition of penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As against the assessee’s stand of ...

Income Tax

June 2, 2018

You may also like:

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - forex loss was claimed as revenue expenditure - inadvertent claim of expenditure would not, ipso facto, amount to concealment of income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - difference of opinion with regard to the nature of expenditure would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - AT

Quick Updates: