Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - The assessee had not concealed ...

Income Tax

June 5, 2018

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - The assessee had not concealed any income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The exemption u/s. 11 of the Act was denied to the assessee on a mere change of opinion - No penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - The assessee had not concealed ...

Income Tax

June 5, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the mere disallowance under section 43B would not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AO has not unearthed any new fact from his independent sources which could lead to furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - there is concealment of income from the HUF, i.e., knowingly the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income for computation...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - absence of due care does not mean that the assessee is guilty of either furnishing inaccurate particulars or attempting to conceal its income -...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

Assessee neither challenged reopening nor has been able to disprove the finding of AO - penalty leviable u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee furnished inaccurate particulars and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Quick Updates: