Bad debts - CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently held that the ...

Income Tax

August 29, 2018

Bad debts - CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently held that the respondent bank would also be a scheduled bank and consequently allowed the bad debts u/s 36(1)(viia)(a) of the Act. Such being the position, we find no error in the view.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Bad debts - CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently held that the ...

Income Tax

August 29, 2018

You may also like:

Provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) against the advances of rural branches - The circular mentions that the provisions of new clause (viia) of section...

Bad debts in respect of chit groups - Bad debts can be allowed to the extent of instalments defaulted by the prized subscribers and written off as bad debt - AT

Advances made to rural branches of bank – Whether deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) can exceed the amount of provision for bad and doubtful debts - Held no - AT

Disallowance of bad debts written off - Admittedly, the provision was created by the assessee in the earlier year out of the profit and loss account. Thus, any...

Deduction of bad debt written off u/s. 36(i) (vii) - lease rental - the prospects of recovery of lease rentals were quite bleak and the assessee considering that the...

Claim of bad debts – advance given for purchase of capital assets are not allowable as bad debts/business loss - AT

Bad and doubtful debts written off disallowed – provision for bad and doubtful debts cannot be allowed u/s 36(1)(vii) - AT

Business loss or Bad Debts - written off of advances – advances given for material supply – held as business loss instead of bad debts - claim allowed - AT

Disallowance of bad debts written off - bad debts in respect of subscriptions defaulted by the prized subscribers - The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s decision...

Disallowance of bad debts u/s 36(1) - The non-realisation of debt can result in bad debt written off if the same is written off in the books. Since it is not the case...

Quick Updates: