Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2018 Year 2018 This

Review of Order - Doctrine of merger - Admittedly, in the case ...


Doctrine of Merger Inapplicable: No Speaking Order from High or Apex Courts in Central Excise Case Review.

September 1, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Review of Order - Doctrine of merger - Admittedly, in the case in hand, the Hon'ble High Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court has not passed any speaking order, in that circumstances, doctrine merging is not applicable to the facts of the case.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

  2. Doctrine of Merger - Once the superior court has disposed of the list before it either way - it is the decree or order of the superior court which is final and binding....

  3. Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

  4. The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

  5. Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

  6. Applicability of Doctrine of Merger - The doctrine of merger would not apply in this case. This is because the Apex Court while permitting leave to withdraw the appeal...

  7. In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

  8. Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

  9. The Central Government rescinded Notification No. 10/2022-Central Excise and Notification No. 11/2022-Central Excise, both dated 30th June 2022, pertaining to the...

  10. Doctrine of merger - Earlier Supreme Court dismissed appeal as non maintainable - Once leave to appeal has been granted and appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court has...

  11. This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

  12. The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

  13. A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

  14. The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

  15. HC dismissed the review petition against its order that had remitted the case for fresh assessment. The court found no grounds for review as the original order was based...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates