The loss caused by embezzlement by the employee was incidental ...

Income Tax

September 26, 2018

The loss caused by embezzlement by the employee was incidental to the employment and entrustment of duty and should be allowed in computing the business income of the year under consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The loss caused by embezzlement by the employee was incidental ...

Income Tax

September 26, 2018

You may also like:

Disallowance of expenditure - loss by embezzlement by employees should be treated as incidental to business and the same should be allowed as deduction in the year in...

Loss due to embezzlement by an employee - loss on account of theft be treated as business loss - no interference reuired - - HC

Claim of deduction against Embezzlement of funds by the employees of the assessee-society - Undisputedly, no doubt has been cast on the embezzlement of funds -...

Provision towards fraud – the incident which resulted in irregularities/embezzlement occurred during the previous year – thus, the loss has to be held to have...

Allowability of business loss - the embezzlement by one of the Directors/employee during the ordinary course of business is a pilferage of the company funds can be a...

Levy of service tax - remuneration paid by a company to the Managing Director and the whole time Executive Director - whether such income is a salary income or otherwise...

Dismissal of Section 9 petition - initiation of CIRP - Dues of employees - The NCLAT examined the employment tenure of the appellant and found evidence supporting...

Disallowance on account of bad debt/trading loss - the assessee is eligible for the deduction of the amount embezzled by the employee as a trading loss.

Embezzlement loss must be deemed to have arisen only when employer comes to know about it and realizes that the amount embezzled cannot be recovered and not merely from...

Disallowance of bad debt/forfeiture of advance - If there is direct and proximate nexus between the business operation and the loss, or it is incidental to it, then the...

Quick Updates: