Penalty u/r 25 of CER - the Tribunal while passing the impugned ...

Tribunal's Rs. 5,00,000 penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules overturned due to lack of justification.

November 5, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Penalty u/r 25 of CER - the Tribunal while passing the impugned order did not give any reason as to why the penalty of ₹ 5,00,000/- should be confirmed - Penalty set aside

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 25 of CER - the Tribunal while passing the impugned ...

Tribunal's Rs. 5,00,000 penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules overturned due to lack of justification.

November 5, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

The notification amends the National Financial Reporting Authority (Manner of Appointment and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules,...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their...

The appellants were found involved in smuggling one cut piece of foreign origin gold weighing 645.500 grams. A concealed the gold in his shoe to deliver it outside the...

CESTAT upheld penalty under Section 112(b) of Customs Act against appellant for involvement in cigarette smuggling racket. While appellant retracted initial statement,...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

The ITAT allowed the appellant's claim for exemption under section 10(10AA) for earned leave encashment received upon retirement. Relying on the Jaipur Bench decision in...

Quick Updates: