Allowance of interest expenditure u/s 37 - interest paid to the ...

Income Tax

November 28, 2018

Allowance of interest expenditure u/s 37 - interest paid to the depositors - there was no business in finance carried on by the Firms and the partners had merely taken advances from the firm, the application of which was not the concern of the firm - Interest expenditure not allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Allowance of interest expenditure u/s 37 - interest paid to the ...

Income Tax

November 28, 2018

You may also like:

Medical expenditure incurred in USA on Cancer Treatment of the proprietor (deceased) of the business - Allowance expenditure u/s 37(1) - Tri

Assessee has raised loans and paid interest and forwarded the same for non-business consideration therefore the interest from the said amount cannot be allowed as...

Waiver of interest u/s 36(vii) – he waiver of interest at the instance of the State Government, has to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) - no addition - AT

Claim of expenditure u/s 37(1) - medical insurance premium paid for the family members of the employees of the company - Claim of expenses allowed as business expenditure.

Dis-allowance u/s 43B - entry tax, welfare cess, Provident fund, Interest to public institutions - expenditure dis-allowed for want of proof that taxes have been paid...

Pharmaceutical companies’ gifting freebies to doctors, etc. - whether Allowable Business expenditure under Section 37(1)?

Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - Settlement charges paid to SEBI - penalty paid for infraction of law - payment was made without admitting or denying the guilt - claim...

Allowance of discount on issue of debenture as expenditure – the same is for the business/commercial expediency and hence is allowable expenditure. - AT

Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by...

Expenditure claimed by the assessee to fund the higher education of its director had an intimate and direct connection with its business - expenditure allowed u/s 37(1) - HC

Quick Updates: