Manufacture or not - The opportunity given for causing ...

Appellants' Demand Overturned Due to Quasi-Judicial Lethargy and Ignored Cross-Examination Directions.

December 29, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Manufacture or not - The opportunity given for causing verification of the activity of the appellants was frittered away only due to quasi-judicial lethargy. The directions for granting cross examination was also not honoured - Demand set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Manufacture or not - The opportunity given for causing ...

Appellants' Demand Overturned Due to Quasi-Judicial Lethargy and Ignored Cross-Examination Directions.

December 29, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Disciplinary proceedings against formerly Appellate Deputy Commissioner - If the order passed by the quasi judicial authority is taken as a foundation for bringing the...

The appellant sought stay of the impugned order citing violation of principles of natural justice due to denial of cross-examination of witnesses in quasi-judicial...

Audit Objections – relevance in making re-assessments - The function of the audit is essentially executive in nature, while the function of the assessing officer and his...

Deduction u/s 80IB - Central Sales-tax assessment order is a quasi judicial order which cannot be ignored and in case we believe the story of Revenue authorities it will...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Benefit of SabkaVishwas Legal Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019 - The High Court observed that, the Supreme Court had an effect of extending the period of...

Stay of demand - 1st respondent as the appellate authority exercises quasi-judicial powers. Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to...

Claim of damage for loss of job and mental disturbance due to Customs Investigation Proceedings - Company secretary being CFO - Validity of statement made in...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

The Delhi High Court upheld the order quashing of the disciplinary proceedings against the Regional Director (NR) of ROC, emphasizing the distinction between executive...

HC quashed the authority's refusal to allow cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were used in show cause notice under CGST Act. The court emphasized that when...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Quick Updates: