Once the appellant has paid the amount as per Rule 6(3) of CCR, ...

Appellant's Compliance with Rule 6(3) CCR Prevents Revenue Reversal Demand; Penalty Imposition Deemed Unjustified.

January 2, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Once the appellant has paid the amount as per Rule 6(3) of CCR, the Revenue cannot insist that the appellants should reverse the entire credit - the appellants in order to buy peace reverse the entire credit and also paid the interest on the remaining amount - thus, it was not justified to impose penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Once the appellant has paid the amount as per Rule 6(3) of CCR, ...

Appellant's Compliance with Rule 6(3) CCR Prevents Revenue Reversal Demand; Penalty Imposition Deemed Unjustified.

January 2, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Key aspects of the telecommunication service provided by the appellants and the related service tax implications. It discusses whether the services were provided with or...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

Validity of SCN - Reversal of CENVAT Credit - demand at specified percentage of the sales/transfer value of the exempted product - The appellant have reversed the...

Imposition of penalty u/r 15(2) of CCR, 2004 - CENVAT Credit - No evidence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts which are essential conditions...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Demand of Interest and penalty - it is hard to say that the reversal of CENVAT Credit under Rule 3(5) by the appellant of the proportionate amount of credit taken on the...

Reversal of CENVAT credit - removal of scrap generated and old capital goods - whether the appellant is required to pay duty by way of reversal under Rule 3(5) or...

Reversal of Credit availed but not utilized - penalty waived but demand of interest confirmed - HC

CENVAT credit - activity of trading - Rule 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 - The Revenue’s appeal will succeed to an extent of reversal of cenvat credit for normal period along with...

Levy of penalty - When the audit was conducted, the appellant had paid service tax on the rent received as on 24.01.2012 in respect of the shops in the mall. This amount...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Quick Updates: