Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once the vendor and vendee have accepted ...

Income Tax

January 15, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once the vendor and vendee have accepted the receipt and the payment of unaccounted money, subsequent retraction has no relevance and it is a valid piece of evidence.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once the vendor and vendee have accepted ...

Income Tax

January 15, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - excess expenses disallowed and suppression of receipts - being bonafide mistake in accounting the total contract receipts, no penalty.

Validity of confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – ssessee miserably failed to offer an explanation for the cash credit raised in the form of share application money -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO had come to the conclusion that for want of suppling sufficient material by the assessee, the claim of commission cannot be accepted - No penalty - HC

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on unrecorded receipts, expenditure and investments declared by the assessee pursuant to search confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

Levy of penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - additional income disclosed due to search and survey at the premises - wherein the returned income has been accepted, penalty cannot be imposed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Refund claim - credit of additional duty of customs (CVD) on inputs imported - It is clear that even as per the tripartite contracts, the appellants are a sort of...

Quick Updates: