Quantum of penalty u/s 78 of FA - the facts of the case have not ...

Service Tax

January 23, 2019

Quantum of penalty u/s 78 of FA - the facts of the case have not fully convinced us to waive the entire penalty, as there has been chronic default committed by the assessee in regular intervals by failing to pay the service tax within the time permitted under the Statute - penalty reduced to 10%

View Source

← Previous Next →

Quantum of penalty u/s 78 of FA - the facts of the case have not ...

Service Tax

January 23, 2019

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Imposition of penalty u/s 76 of the FA, 1994 - delayed payment of tax - financial difficulty - invocation of section 80 - it is a fit case to waive the penalty - AT

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Penalty - service tax is paid along with interest before issuance of SCN - applicability of Section 73(3) of the FA - levy of penalty waived for more than one reason - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - even if the appellant subsequently pays the amount on being pointed out by the department, along with interest, imposition of penalty under...

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under Sections 76 and 78, when the first appellate authority waived the penalty under Section 77 itself - AT

Quick Updates: