Clandestine removal - Revenue were not able to provide even the ...

Revenue Dept's Claims Questioned: No Buyer Info or Independent Evidence on Alleged Clandestine Goods Removal.

January 24, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - Revenue were not able to provide even the single buyer’s name and address who has purchased such goods from them which leads to doubt about the credibility of their statement. The department apart from the papers seized from the locker has not been able to give any independent evidence which can corroborate the charges.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - Revenue were not able to provide even the ...

Revenue Dept's Claims Questioned: No Buyer Info or Independent Evidence on Alleged Clandestine Goods Removal.

January 24, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Refund of SAD - Stamp of endorsement - Even though it is alleged by the department that two sales invoices did not bear the required endorsement, it is not established...

Valuation of excisable goods - genuine factory gate price - No documents have been produced before us by the Revenue to substantiate their claim that goods were not sold...

HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

Clandestine manufacture and removal allegation - substantial electricity consumption cited as evidence - no other corroborative evidence found - Revenue failed to rebut...

Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

CESTAT adjudicated a dispute involving self-credit and CENVAT credit claims. The tribunal comprehensively examined allegations of erroneous refund and excess credit...

Imposition of personal penalty on two Directors - valuation of goods - In any event, excise is a levy on manufacture and it is found that it is not the case of the...

Disallowance of commission expenses - Non-service of letters to the buyers or non-compliance of the letters by the buyers does not show that the payment of commission...

Attachment orders - petitioner(bank) taken over property of guarantor of loan and sold the same - firstly attachment made by the dept. of the the properties belonging to...

CESTAT allowed the appeal against allegations of clandestine production and removal of sponge iron. Revenue's case relied solely on theoretical input-output ratios...

Appellant imported goods from Malaysia and claimed preferential duty under Indo-ASEAN FTA, declaring Malaysian origin. Revenue alleged goods were of Chinese origin...

Bogus LTCG - onus to prove - Penny stock purchases - Claim made u/s 10(38) denied - ITAT remanded the matter back - Where all the evidence had been produced and the...

The ITAT addressed multiple issues related to the assessee's eligibility for deduction u/s 80IA and various additions made by the AO. The AO's assessment u/s 153A...

Quick Updates: