Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade ...

Service Tax

February 1, 2019

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade tax is understood form its very conduct of non-filing of periodic returns and even not answering to the notices sent at least on three occasions - demand confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - the intention of the appellant to evade ...

Service Tax

February 1, 2019

You may also like:

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 of FA - There are no positive evidence has been brought on record in the entire proceedings that non-payment of tax was attributable to reasons to...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - allegation of evasion of service tax - The assessee being a public sector undertaking of the Government of India is an additional factor...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Tax paid on being pointed out - The conduct of the appellant of prompt payment of Service Tax immediately after gaining knowledge about its...

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Restoration of penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - On being pointed out, the assessee has immediately paid the service tax along with interest. Given this factual...

Penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - Non-payment of Service Tax collected from clients due to the financial difficulties - The delay / non-payment of service tax cannot...

Imposition of penalty under Section 54(1) (14) of UP VAT Act - The Tribunal has only observed that non-filing of various columns in Form 38 indicates that there was...

Quick Updates: