Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2019 Year 2019 This

Refund of duty - Principles of unjust enrichment - appellant has ...


Appellant Granted Customs Duty Refund Due to Unjust Enrichment; Duty Recorded as Receivables, Not Manufacturing Costs.

February 14, 2019

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Refund of duty - Principles of unjust enrichment - appellant has not included customs duty element (CVD and SAD) on the goods imported in the cost of their manufacture and has only accounted for them as amounts receivable in their books of accounts - appellant has not passed on the burden of customs duty - refund allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

  2. The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

  3. Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

  4. Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

  5. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

  6. Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

  7. Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

  8. Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was...

  9. The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

  10. Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

  11. Appellant established that incidence of duty was not passed on to customers. Refund sanctioning authority's report confirmed duty was not mentioned on invoices issued to...

  12. Refund of Customs duty - principle of unjust enrichment - as per Certificate issued by the CA in favour of the respondent/Assessee to the effect that the amount of...

  13. Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

  14. CESTAT determined refund claim's limitation period starts from final adjudication date (13.10.2015), not provisional assessment date. Refund application filed on...

  15. Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates