Clandestine removal - the alleged printouts were not from any ...

Court Dismisses Evidence Due to Doubts Over Pendrive Data Used in Central Excise Intelligence Case.

February 18, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - the alleged printouts were not from any computer but from standalone pendrive(s) fed into computer(s) in the office of the DGCEI which is palpably incorrect and susceptible to innumerable doubts - Demand set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - the alleged printouts were not from any ...

Court Dismisses Evidence Due to Doubts Over Pendrive Data Used in Central Excise Intelligence Case.

February 18, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Priority of dues between the Central Excise Department and secured creditors in cases of attachment of properties for recovery. The Supreme Court held that the Central...

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Recovery of Central Excise Duty alongwith interest and penalty - landowners - As far as dues of the Central Excise are concerned, they were not related to the said plant...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

The ITAT invalidated digital evidence seized during a search operation, specifically a pendrive, as inadmissible under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The...

The Central Government rescinded Notification No. 10/2022-Central Excise and Notification No. 11/2022-Central Excise, both dated 30th June 2022, pertaining to the...

Sale of mortgaged property for recovery of excise dues - Excise dues are not dues which arise out of land or building. Such liabilities could be in the form of property...

Central Excise Act interpretation regarding use of oxygen in sulphuric acid manufacturing. Tribunal upheld that oxygen produced by respondent was not used in sulphuric...

Recovery of confirmed dues and penalties - section 35 F of Central Excise Act, 1944, read with section 35C (2A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 and with rule 41 of Customs...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show...

The dispute pertained to the excise duty payable on certain goods, with the petitioner and the excise department adopting different classifications. The key issues were...

Quick Updates: