Bogus purchases - sales has been accepted then the corresponding ...

Income Tax

March 16, 2019

Bogus purchases - sales has been accepted then the corresponding purchases is required to be deducted for the purpose of arriving at profit - under the Income tax Act, the profit earned from the business transactions is alone taxable - CIT(A) to tax only 12.50% of purchases is upheld

View Source

← Previous Next →

Bogus purchases - sales has been accepted then the corresponding ...

Income Tax

March 16, 2019

You may also like:

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

Bogus purchases - Since the corresponding sales have been accepted and the assessee had shown reasonable gross profit on sale, therefore, confirming the addition to the...

Bogus purchase - Though purchases were from bogus parties nevertheless purchases themselves were not bogus. - in the absence of the purchases, there could not be sales -...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal addressed various issues, including the validity of the reopening of assessment, the genuineness of purchases,...

Taxability of Bogus purchase - Estimation of profit - in cases where purchases are not proved with necessary evidences, only profit element embedded on those purchases...

Restriction of disallowance - Bogus purchases - Restriction of disallowance @30% of total disallowance – addition of 12.5% net profit on bogus purchase is reasonable - AT

Bogus purchases - it cannot be said that the purchase have been bogus especially when the quantitative details have been tallied item wise and the sale proceeds have...

Bogus purchases - In a case where sales are considered genuine, no addition, on account of bogus purchases, can be made - AT

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchases of diamonds - The decision emphasizes the principle that where the genuineness of purchases is in question, but corresponding sales...

Whether the purchases themselves were bogus - not the entire amount covered under such purchase, but the profit element embedded therein would be subject to tax - HC

Quick Updates: