Refund claim - time limitation - amounts were paid during the ...

Central Excise

April 2, 2019

Refund claim - time limitation - amounts were paid during the investigation - Wherever the duty has been paid in excess of what was required to be paid or has been claimed to be paid in excess of what have been required to paid, the provisions of Section 11B apply in full force.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - time limitation - amounts were paid during the ...

Central Excise

April 2, 2019

You may also like:

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under...

Suo moto credit versus filing of refund claim - suo moto credit can be taken if duty is paid twice as excess duty paid is not a duty and same is deposit - AT

Refund claim - excess duty paid due to downward revision of price - They have furnished CA certificate to substantiate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on...

Claim of refund of excess duty of customs paid - exemption from customs duty - assessee has not challenged the assessment before any appellate Forum - refund allowed - AT

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Refund claim - price variation clause - appellant entitled to refund of the excess duty paid due the deductions towards non achievement of GPF - AT

Refund claim rejected as time bared - Since amount was paid as duty to Custom by the importer, the provision of section 27 of the Custom Act, are applicable - AT

Rebate of duty paid on export goods - Petitioner paid lesser duty on domestic product and higher duty on export product which was not payable - Cash refund of excess...

CENVAT Credit - Denial of refund claim - Whether the appellant was correct in taking credit on his own in respect of amount paid by him in excess in October 2001 - Held No - AT

Quick Updates: