Dishonor of Cheque - Merely because the petitioner has been ...

Indian Laws

April 13, 2019

Dishonor of Cheque - Merely because the petitioner has been accepted as an NRI by the income tax authorities does not mean that there would be no occasion for him to participate in or being responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the company accused.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Dishonor of Cheque - Merely because the petitioner has been ...

Indian Laws

April 13, 2019

You may also like:

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - cheque was issued prior to the date of director joining the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of the Managing Director of the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on record any unimpeachable material or material of...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of the independent Director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as...

Dishonor of cheque - Responsibility of Director not engaged in day to day affair of the company - Director having majority shareholding - The complainant in his...

Dishonor of cheque - Is "an Insolvent" a immune from criminal prosecution arising out of dishonour of cheque? - Held No - HC

Foreign gifts received - NRI gift could not be accepted as genuine unless the assessee was able to prove natural love and affection and financial capacity of the donor - HC

Gift from stranger - NRI gift could not be accepted as genuine unless the assessee was able to prove natural love and affection and financial capacity of the donor - HC

Dishonor of Cheque - person responsible for day to day affairs of the company - In the facts of the present case, the only averment in the complaint is that the...

Quick Updates: