Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had ...

Withdrawal of LTCG Exemption Claim u/s 10(38) Results in No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

May 14, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) as it suffered STT but subsequently withdrew the claim - at the most it may be considered as an unsubstantiated or wrong claim but it cannot be held to be furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of income - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had ...

Withdrawal of LTCG Exemption Claim u/s 10(38) Results in No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

May 14, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) whereas sale of shares was not through stock exchange - company adopted LIFO method where as AO adopted FIFO...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no STT was paid - the assessee having not disclosed fully and truly all the material facts relevant to the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed...

Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

The ITAT Mumbai upheld the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for bogus LTCG. Exemption u/s 10(38) denied as revised income declaration was not voluntary but in response to...

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s.10(38) denied - the assessee submitted a letter withdrawing the LTCG claim u/s 10(38) and offered the same as income. Therefore, once the...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Assessment u/s 153A - Bogus claim of LTCG - the assessee has discharged the necessary onus cast on him in terms of claim of exemption of long term capital gains u/s...

Quick Updates: