Rectification u/s 254 - non discussion of case law relied upon - ...

Income Tax

June 13, 2019

Rectification u/s 254 - non discussion of case law relied upon - it is not necessary for Court/Tribunal to discuss the case relied in the order as long the larger ratio rendered by the courts is not in conformity with the facts of the present case - assessee failed to make out a case of mistakes apparent on record - no rectification

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - non discussion of case law relied upon - ...

Income Tax

June 13, 2019

You may also like:

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - non consideration of decision refereed by the assessee in dealing with appeal - a mistake apparent from record - Tribunal recalled its order.

Rectification u/s 254(2) - failure to take cognizance of certain judicial pronouncements - non-consideration of the judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and the...

Rectification u/s 254 - non-consideration of decision of tribunal relied upon by the assessee on identical fact - decision subsequently approved by Hon’ble Bombay High...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) – What assessee desires is review of the order passed on in the garb of rectification application - AT

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel...

Demand of duty - Appelalnt sought the grant of inspection of the investigation file and the non-relied upon documents (Non-RUDs) - appellant allowed to investigate the...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Where the issue sought to be rectified was not appealed before HC, application cannot be rejected on the ground of Doctrine of merger - HC

Duty demand - Non supply of proper documents - adjudicating authority directed to supply the ‘non-relied upon documents’ to the appellants - AT

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Tribunal was not justified in recalling the order passed by it in toto and setting the matter down for a fresh hearing - HC

Quick Updates: