Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2012 Year 2012 This

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of ...

Income Tax

August 10, 2012

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s 254(2) as a patent, manifest and self-evident error which does not require elaborate discussion of evidence or arguments to establish it - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Tribunal does not have power to review its judgment under Section 254(2) of the Act, which authorises the Tribunal to only correct its mistakes - HC

  2. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - If such prayer is allowed then in every case, where the assessee is not satisfied with the finding of the Tribunal, the MA will be...

  3. Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel...

  4. Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of certain grounds - there is an inadvertent mistake by the Tribunal in not disposing of grounds no.2, 3 and 6, which comes...

  5. Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

  6. Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

  7. Rectification of mistake - issue of limitation was not considered - Tribunal was correct in exercising its jurisdiction u/s 35C(2) of the Act and correct its mistake by...

  8. Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

  9. Tribunal apparently fell into an error in not rectifying the said mistake apparent on the face of record, which is nothing more than a mistake of fact and even if it is...

  10. Jurisdiction of ITAT - No new plea can be raised by invoking the jurisdiction of the Tribunal u/s 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal is bound to adjudicate only...

  11. Rectification u/s 254(2) - receipt from other advertisers towards sale of online ad space in Inida under AdWord Program is chargeable to tax as 'Royalty - issue is...

  12. Rectification u/s 254 - No mistake, much less, a mistake apparent on the face of record as envisaged under section 254(2) of the Act. What the assessee wants by filing...

  13. Validity of order of Tribunal extending the stay beyond a period of 185 days - delay in disposing of the appeal is attributable to the assessee - Scope of Section...

  14. Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

  15. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates