Maintainability of the appeal u/s 260A before HC whereas the ...

Income Tax

July 18, 2019

Maintainability of the appeal u/s 260A before HC whereas the rectification application u/s 254(2) is pending before the ITAT - there are substantial questions of law to be decided, hence pendency of a petition for rectification u/s 254(2) can have no impact - appeal is maintainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of the appeal u/s 260A before HC whereas the ...

Income Tax

July 18, 2019

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) – What assessee desires is review of the order passed on in the garb of rectification application - AT

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Where the issue sought to be rectified was not appealed before HC, application cannot be rejected on the ground of Doctrine of merger - HC

Maintainability of appeal before HC - ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the ground that tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit, i.e. tax effect of Rs....

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

Miscellaneous application maintainability as filed beyond the limitation period as provided u/s 254(2) - where there is no provision for condonation of delay for filing...

Rectification u/s 254 - No mistake, much less, a mistake apparent on the face of record as envisaged under section 254(2) of the Act. What the assessee wants by filing...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Rectification of mistake - Merely because the assessee has challenged the order of the Tribunal in an Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Tribunal was not justified in recalling the order passed by it in toto and setting the matter down for a fresh hearing - HC

Quick Updates: