Addition u/s 69C on the basis of valuation report - unexplained ...

Income Tax

September 23, 2019

Addition u/s 69C on the basis of valuation report - unexplained expenditure - assessee has not maintained books of account and fail to furnish bills and vouchers in support of material purchased to substantiate the cost of construction of the house - additions confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69C on the basis of valuation report - unexplained ...

Income Tax

September 23, 2019

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69C – Unexplained expenditure - only because parties has given a different accounting treatment in its books of account, it cannot be said that the assessee...

Unexplained investment - No addition can be made on the basis of the report of the DVO without the books of account being rejected, wherein expenditure relating to the...

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Additions cannot be made u/s 69C of the Act, as unexplained expenditure, towards difference between purchase price found in loose slips and amount recorded in books of account - AT

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - ITAT has also noted that the huge addition was made in the case of assessee’s group in the block assessment on the basis of the books...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - expenditure of stamp duty paid for registration of property sold - additions confirmed - HC

Additions made u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure – Whether the Assessing Officer had acted on conjectures and surmises – Held no, additions confirmed - HC

Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - Section 69C clearly refers to the “source of the expenditure” and not to the expenditure itself - AT

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - once estimation of GP has been made on the unaccounted sales it covers unexplained expenditure also to this extent - AT

Addition solely on the basis of Departmental valuation report – addition cannot be justified solely relying upon the valuation report - HC

Quick Updates: