The Special Director has enhanced the penalty arbitrarily ...

Penalty Increased Unilaterally by Special Director, Order Void from Start Due to Lack of Department Appeal.

October 5, 2019

Case Laws FEMA AT

The Special Director has enhanced the penalty arbitrarily without any Appeal filed by the Department, as if the Special Director is himself the aggrieved party, which renders the order void ab initio.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Special Director has enhanced the penalty arbitrarily ...

Penalty Increased Unilaterally by Special Director, Order Void from Start Due to Lack of Department Appeal.

October 5, 2019

Case Laws FEMA AT

You may also like:

Fee payable to CA Firms, for Special Audits directed u/s 142(2A) - CA Firm registered as MSME - Recovery of fees due from the Income Tax Department invoking the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Seeks to increase the effective rate of Special Additional Excise Duty on Petrol and Diesel.

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Goods under dispute were sawn New Zealand pine logs classified under CTH 4403 by the importer, while the department sought to reclassify them under CTH 4407. The key...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

The Department initiated the case based on income tax documents, which were public documents, and the presumption is on their truthfulness. The difference in value based...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

HC set aside penalty order u/s 270A and notice of demand u/s 156 due to procedural oversight. Department acknowledged they weren't informed about pending appeal...

Quick Updates: