Smuggling - Gold Jewellery - Proof of purchase of gold submitted ...

Appellant's Late Evidence Fails to Overturn Smuggling Allegations; Decision Favors Revenue Authorities.

October 11, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

Smuggling - Gold Jewellery - Proof of purchase of gold submitted first time during the appellate proceedings only - There is no explanation forthcoming as to why, if, in fact, the gold had been purchased by the appellant within India, the aforesaid invoices were not available with the respondent till the stage of appeal - Decided in favor of revenue.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Smuggling - Gold Jewellery - Proof of purchase of gold submitted ...

Appellant's Late Evidence Fails to Overturn Smuggling Allegations; Decision Favors Revenue Authorities.

October 11, 2019

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The appellant's gold was seized at the airport based on suspicions of smuggling. However, procedural irregularities, doubts about the voluntariness of the appellant's...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellants in a gold jewelry smuggling case, overturning earlier decisions by Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Smuggling of Cattle Heads - confiscation - penalties imposed - corroborative evidence - fraudulently used the Challan belonging to the some other party - The Tribunal...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Smuggling - Seizure of mobile handsets of Chinese origin - In view of admitted town seizure, it was the onus on the Customs Department to lead evidence in support of...

Town Seizure - Absolute confiscation of gold - imposition of penalties on the firm as well as on the appellants - The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to provide...

CESTAT ruled against absolute confiscation of gold and penalties under s.112(b) of Customs Act, 1962. Officers seized gold based on alleged smuggling from Bangladesh,...

Proof of smuggling of goods - DW.1 (revenue officer) stated in evidence that it was suspected that articles were smuggled and that it was believed that the articles were...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

Refusal for Renewal of Customs Broker’s Licence - The Tribunal noted serious allegations against the appellant, including the suppression of facts regarding the original...

Advance Authorisation Scheme - Non-fulfilment of Export Obligation - fraudulent activities - allegation of collusion with the Customs officials - The CESTAT examined the...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Smuggling of betel nut and black pepper of foreign origin - The Appellate Tribunal observed that while the ARDF report suggested the goods might be of Indonesian origin,...

Clandestine manufacture and removal allegation - substantial electricity consumption cited as evidence - no other corroborative evidence found - Revenue failed to rebut...

Quick Updates: