Refund of SAD - As regards unjust enrichment Board itself has ...

Customs

December 4, 2019

Refund of SAD - As regards unjust enrichment Board itself has clarified the issue that Chartered Accountant certificate indicating non passing of duty to the customers is sufficient. - It is well settled that Revenue cannot argue against the Board’s Circular which are in favour of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - As regards unjust enrichment Board itself has ...

Customs

December 4, 2019

You may also like:

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - certificate of Chartered Accountant produced by the appellant was not disputed by bringing on record any other opinion contrary to the...

Unjust enrichment - Consumer Welfare Fund - refund of cash security which was made in terms of the Board's circular does not attract the provisions unjust enrichment - AT

Refund claim - SAD - importer appointed a new Chartered Accountant, who becomes their regular Chartered Accountant and cannot be considered as a onetime independent...

Refund of Service Tax paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Service tax was paid under wrong head - Rejection of certificate of the Chartered Accountant - certificate...

Refund claim of SAD - Principles of Unjust Enrichment - Scope of CA certificate - Refund already sanctioned by the lower authorities - Merely stating that ‘the review...

Refund claim of SAD - unjust enrichment - CA certificate is sufficient as per the Board’s Circular No. 18/10-Cus., dated 8-7-2010, to discharge the liability of bar of...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Quick Updates: