Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 ...

High Court's Role Under Article 226/227 in NCLT Orders: When Intervention is Justified Despite Appeal Options.

December 5, 2019

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy SC

Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, with an Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal in a proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ignoring the availability of a statutory remedy of appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and if so, under what circumstances? - NCLT and NCLAT would not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes such as those arising under MMDR Act, 1957 - HC was justified to interfere.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 ...

High Court's Role Under Article 226/227 in NCLT Orders: When Intervention is Justified Despite Appeal Options.

December 5, 2019

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy SC

You may also like:

Impugned order by NCLT granting interim injunction against petitioners set aside for being non-speaking, unreasoned, cryptic, laconic without considering triple test for...

Judicial orders of civil court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution; - Jurisdiction under Article 227 is distinct from...

The SC held that the HC has incorrectly exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 in granting the respondent/claimant one more opportunity to...

The single judge dismissed the writ petition; substance of the order is under Article 227 and no power under Article 226 of the Constitution has been exercised - the...

Validity of impugned order u/s 73 of the CGST Act - The case before the Calcutta High Court involved a challenge to an order issued under the CGST Act, wherein the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Reason to believe - Pertinently, the question of going into the veracity and genuineness of material/evidence forming the opinion...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article...

It cannot be hold that an advance ruling of the Authority can only be challenged under Article 136 of the Constitution before this Court and not under Articles 226...

HC upholds maintainability of writ petition under Article 226 concerning regulatory oversight of ECL. Petitioner challenged RBI's failure to exercise statutory powers...

Company under liquidation as per IBC - Validity of arbitration order while moratorium ordered by the NCLT was still in operation - This Court finds that the learned...

Arbitration Award - Maintainability of petition before the HC - availability of alternative remedy of appeal - Against the award made by the learned Arbitrator made...

Condonation of delay of 5 months and 3 days in filing appeal before the Commissioner (appeals) - A litigant does not stand to benefit by resorting to delay. In fact he...

The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed on the...

Importantly, a contract for manufacture simpliciter is not a works contract under the definition provided under Section 2(k) - It is a settled law that the...

Condonation of delay - There is no prohibition for this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution in exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction to condone the...

Quick Updates: