Valuation of imported goods - misdeclaration - contemporaneous ...

Court Rules MRP-Based Duty on Imported Goods Incorrect Due to Lack of Indian Manufacturing and Legal Metrology Act Applicability.

December 30, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Valuation of imported goods - misdeclaration - contemporaneous import value - the differential duty worked out and demanded from the appellant based on MRP of M/s EGPL is bad and untenable for the reason that the goods are not manufactured in India. Thus, there is no prescribed MRP by the manufacturer under the legal Metrology Act read with the rules thereunder.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of imported goods - misdeclaration - contemporaneous ...

Court Rules MRP-Based Duty on Imported Goods Incorrect Due to Lack of Indian Manufacturing and Legal Metrology Act Applicability.

December 30, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Valuation of imported goods - MRP based valuation or transaction value - CVD - AT

Methodologies for re-determination of CVD payable on imports on MRP basis - Imports of notebook / laptop computers - The tribunal found that there was no statutory...

Valuation of imported goods - aircraft engine - vehicle expressly imported for a limited period and for ‘stop gap’ fitment during the overhaul of the regular engines by...

MRP based valuation - imports - the appellants are importing the goods not for retail sale but for repacking, labelling and branding and selling the same in bulk - No...

CESTAT ruled against inclusion of 4% running royalty in transaction value of imported goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The Tribunal found that...

Import of Baggage - When the baggage is “imported” as goods, such goods are liable to duty and other restrictions under Trade Policy. However, by virtue certain excuses...

CESTAT ruled that imported goods declared "NOT FOR RETAIL SALE" and sold to industrial consumers, whether directly or through distributors, are exempt from MRP/RSP-based...

Valuation of imported goods - payment for the services, sought to be included - The payment for the services, sought to be included by customs authorities in the...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Mis-declaration of value, rejection of assessable value of seized goods, and liability for confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty u/s 111(m) of the Customs Act,...

CESTAT held that affixing MRP on imported electrical home appliances constituted 'manufacture' under Section 2(f)(iii), making it liable for excise duty. The appellant...

CVD demand on the imported goods based on MRP as the goods were imported in 20 kg packing having no MRP declared on the imported package - The appellants affixed the...

Disallowance of prior period expenses pertaining to expenditure crystallized or details received after completion of earlier years' audits. Genuineness not doubted,...

Justification of upholding the penalty imposed u/s 51(7)(b) for goods imported from an excise duty-exempt state on the ground of undervaluation based on MRP provisions...

Import by EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP without payment of duty by Following Rule 5 of Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty) Rules, 2017

Quick Updates: