Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2020 Year 2020 This

SSI Exemption - branded service or not - the appellant is not ...


Appellant Acts as Signal Conduit, Not Providing Branded Service; Relevant for SSI Exemption in Service Tax Analysis.

January 25, 2020

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

SSI Exemption - branded service or not - the appellant is not providing any branded service as MSO is supplying signal to the appellants which has been transmitted to the subscribers, in that circumstances, there is no relation of brand name to the ultimate customers. The appellants are not providing any branded service to the subscribers

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

  2. SSI exemption - use of brand name while providing Mandap Keeper’s Services - N/N. 6/2005-ST - Lower Authorities have rightly held that the appellant was using the brand...

  3. Branded service or not - Cable operator service - SSI Exemption - the appellants are not providing any branded service to the subscribers therefore, the appellants are...

  4. SSI Exemption - manufacture of branded goods - So long the assignment deed in favour of the appellant remains valid, the appellant is entitled to SSI exemption.

  5. SSI exemption - use of brand name - The brand name apparently cannot belong to two different entities if the appellants arguments of HP and HPC are two different legal...

  6. SSI Exemption - use of brand name of another person - Commission Agent Service - it can be seen that Commission Agent service provided by the appellant cannot be treated...

  7. Small service provider - exemption upto ₹ 10 lacs - use of brand name of others - Benefit of N/N. 6/2005-ST - Business Auxiliary services - the appellant is not...

  8. Classification of services provided by Grant Thornton, India to develop the "Grant Thornton" brand name and the payment received towards reimbursement of "Brand...

  9. SSI Exemption - use of Brand/Trade mark or others - as long as assignment stands the assessee using the brand name is eligible for the benefit of SSI exemption notification - AT

  10. SSI Exemption - use of Brand Name of other person - The appellant is using brand name which is also used by other family members cannot be said that the appellant is...

  11. The appellant (M/s. Sepack) engaged in trading sealing machines manufactured by various independent Decentralized Mother Units (DMUs) during the relevant period. DMUs...

  12. SSI exemption – Brand Name - Just because the said brand name Nitco which is owned by the appellant is being used by other companies, the appellant cannot be denied the...

  13. Rejection of Refund claim - Whether the service provided by the appellant to GSPHCL is service provided to a governmental authority? - The GSPHCL is a 100% owned by...

  14. Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

  15. Export of service or not - Palace or provision of services - The case revolved around the Appellant's provision of sales promotion and marketing services to companies...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates