Decision of the Tribunal having assumed finality, is not open to ...

Customs

September 5, 2012

Decision of the Tribunal having assumed finality, is not open to the respondent authorities to either withhold release of the bank guarantees or to withhold refund - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Decision of the Tribunal having assumed finality, is not open to ...

Customs

September 5, 2012

You may also like:

Classification of goods - There is no doubt that the Hon’ble Supreme Court did not render a finality to the dispute over classification but the Tribunal, indubitably,...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

Prosecution u/s 276CC - Settlement Commission has already granted immunity from prosecution to the petitioner - The High Court highlighted the importance of the...

Waiver of penalty u/s 80 – once the adjudicating authority has exercised his discretion for setting aside the penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, that...

Refund - fresh issue of SCN after decision of CESTAT in favor of assessee and remand back - the show cause notice that was again issued by a different Assistant...

Difficulties in filing of GST Tran-1 and other returns - HC directed the revenue to accept returns provisionally either by way of opening the portal or manually.

Jurisdiction of Revisional Authority to revise an order - The decision of the Tribunal may not be acceptable to the Revisional Authority, but that cannot furnish any...

Appeal by revenue - low tax effect - even loss claimed by assessee for a particular year assumes considerable significance in variety of situations - Tribunal committed...

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) u/s 90/90A - Judicial precedent - The Bench is of considered opinion that Ld. first Appellate Authority being Subordinate to the Tribunal was...

Re-opening of proceedings - Only revisional authority has power to seek re-opening of proceedings when Re-assessment order was prejudicial to the interest of revenue - HC

Quick Updates: