Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s.271BA - When the transactions related to the ...

Income Tax

February 20, 2020

Penalty u/s.271BA - When the transactions related to the assessee falls under the clause(i) of Section 92BA of the Act, which has already been removed by the Finance Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2017, therefore, the imposition of penalty u/s.271BA of the Act for failure to furnish the report in prescribed Form No.3CEB in terms of provisions of section 92E of the Act, does not survive at all. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. TP Adjustment - US Transactions non US Transactions - scope of MAP agreement - It would be better to refer to the settlement arrived between the competent authority of...

  2. Penalty u/s 271BA - non- filing of report as required u/s 92E - Once we hold that the assessee and the alleged AE could not be treated as associated enterprises, and...

  3. Penalty u/s 271BA - non furnishing of Report u/s 92E - in Section 271BA words used is “may” and not “shall”, thereby making intentions clear that levy of penalty is...

  4. Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions...

  5. Fall in GP rate - increase in cost of purchase - 95% of sales were made to related parties - Since no explanation was offered by the assessee before the AO regarding...

  6. Penalty u/s 271BA - non-filing of audit report in Form 3CEB - international transactions - the expression "May" used in section 271BA needs to be viewed liberally - in...

  7. Penalty u/s 271BA - admittedly the assessee failed to upload Form No. 3CEB in terms of the statutory requirement - Specified Domestic Transaction - Assessee contended...

  8. Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s 92E - as to whether SPMCECL was a related party is an issue qua which there can possibly be more than...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - assessee advanced interest free loan to its AE - The Tribunal noted that the assessee had disclosed all...

  10. Transaction value - Valuation (Customs) - Special or abnormal discount to the related buyers which were in excess of 3% discount - The Appellate Tribunal observed that...

  11. Disallowance towards Client Maintenance Charges - ‘related party’ - ICICI Bank Ltd. does not fall in the definition of ‘related party’ in terms of Section 40A(2)(b) of...

  12. Penalty u/s 271G – Failure to maintain documents and accounts being audited - AO should have initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AA/271BA – the penalty levied u/s 271G...

  13. CIRP - Preferential Transactions or not - related transaction or not - Transaction within look bak period - such transactions are carried with intent to defraud...

  14. Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

  15. Addition u/s 69A - Addition based on assessee's statement recorded u/s 132(4) - Even there is no question which has been raised to the assessee as part of his statement...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates