Penalty u/s 116 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Since the ...

Penalty Imposed u/s 116 of Customs Act for Unloaded Shipment Discrepancy; Accountability Upheld for Quantity Shortfall.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws Customs CGOVT

Penalty u/s 116 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Since the person-in-charge of conveyance is liable for penalty in case of quantity unloaded is short of the quantity to be unloaded at the destination, the adjudicating authority has correctly imposed the penalty on the respondent under Section 116 of the Customs Act, 1962. - CGOVT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 116 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Since the ...

Penalty Imposed u/s 116 of Customs Act for Unloaded Shipment Discrepancy; Accountability Upheld for Quantity Shortfall.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws Customs CGOVT

You may also like:

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

Imports Of Marble slabs - Mis-declaration of quantity in the declared goods - Considering the appellant's failure to contest the discrepancy during assessment and their...

Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Penalty imposed on trader for importing goods with invalid import declaration form (Form XVI) instead of prescribed Form XVI u/s 48A of Uttarakhand VAT Act. Tribunal...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Levy of penalty - The appellant was accused of failing to produce proper invoices or delivery challans during the transportation of goods, which led to a penalty being...

HC partially allowed the petition challenging GST late fee and penalty impositions. Court upheld late fee under Section 47(2) of GST Act for delayed annual return...

Quick Updates: